The “toothless” independent panel and many questions
Thursday, October 4th, 2007 | 2:52 am @ SKIt’s only the first meeting for the three-man independent panel and yet, so many critical questions went unanswered which create even more doubts. Among them are:
- How do we expect an independent panel to conduct a thorough investigation when it has no legal power, no power to call witness, no power to administer oaths and no immunity under the lawyer as confessed by one of the panel member Mahadev Shankar?
- Why the establishment of an independent panel with so many hoo-ha if the primary and the only objective is merely to investigate the authenticity of the "Lingam video"?
- As the panel is powerless to call for witness, they can only pray hard for witnesses to come forward and testify. The question is, why should the people come forward when the independent panel can’t protect them from prosecution?
- Why the knee-jerk reaction from the Anti Corruption Agency (ACA) where instead of picking up the senior lawyer VK Lingam for further questioning, they’re quizzing messengers like PKR vice-president R Sivarasa and Anwar’s aide Sim Tze Tzin as reported by Malaysiakini? Click here to read blogger Elizabeth Wong’s take on this, in which she calls it "the game of catch the whistleblower".
- What’s the transparency level for the independent panel to carry out their duties when investigations would be conducted on close door basic and the outcome will be submitted only to the Government?
Anyway, as far as we Malaysians are concern, the "Lingam Video Part 1" has created several eruption response from NGOs, activists, bloggers and more importantly, Bar Council which demands nothing less than a royal commission.
The biggest bombshell is yet to come where the "Lingam Video Part 2" still remains in the cold storage, however not without some tit-bits when it was revealed by PKR advisor Anwar Ibrahim that Chief Justice Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim’s name was explicitly mentioned.
The Government is smart enough to know the impact when the "tell-all session" is going to happen as undeniably, up to this stage, it’s an uncharted path on the Government’s part.
So, as much as it’s going to be the horse mouth’s Nazri Aziz intention as the self-appointed spokeperson to deny the existence of any judiciary crisis, the investigation outcome by the independent panel would be essential in helping shaping public opinion towards the Government’s sincerity and determination to give us a transparent, fair and independent judiciary system, in which otherwise is going to hurt the Barisan Nasional’s government image in this coming general election.







